Comments on: Pseudomathematics sympathiser at ScienceBlogs? http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/ A blog about maths (with an "s") and sometimes other things Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:20:50 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: John A. Davison http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-111 John A. Davison Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:36:15 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-111 It matters not whether you ignore me. What matters is that others who visit this blog may not ignore me. Everyone is welcome at my weblog - jadavison.wordpress.com It matters not whether you ignore me. What matters is that others who visit this blog may not ignore me. Everyone is welcome at my weblog -

jadavison.wordpress.com

]]> By: John A. Davison http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-110 John A. Davison Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:45:15 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-110 Please ban me so I can add this blog to all the others that still promote and perpetuate the biggest and most enduring hoax ever conceived by the atheist inspired human imagination. jadavison.wordpress.com Please ban me so I can add this blog to all the others that still promote and perpetuate the biggest and most enduring hoax ever conceived by the atheist inspired human imagination.

jadavison.wordpress.com

]]> By: mattheath http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-94 mattheath Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:01:31 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-94 ahhh JAD you tire me. I'm not a biologist and so naturally I shan't be pointing you to any biology papers but since I never referred to this consensus as being in learned journals that is no relevance. In any case it is you have assumed that this consensus is negative; from where did you get such any idea JAD? As for anonymous: HAHAHA I'm blogging under my own name and my about page says where I work. As for blowhard: I'm not the one turning up on wholly irrelevant comment threads (maths in the newspapers FFS, what does that have to do with biology?) expecting people to care about my tedious ideas (anyone who spends time on science blogs has had a chance to read about your work by now) and caling the blog owner names. I don't get enough comments that you can disturb much so I'm not going to bother banning you, at least for now. But I am henceforth ignoring you. ahhh JAD you tire me. I’m not a biologist and so naturally I shan’t be pointing you to any biology papers but since I never referred to this consensus as being in learned journals that is no relevance. In any case it is you have assumed that this consensus is negative; from where did you get such any idea JAD?

As for anonymous: HAHAHA I’m blogging under my own name and my about page says where I work.

As for blowhard: I’m not the one turning up on wholly irrelevant comment threads (maths in the newspapers FFS, what does that have to do with biology?) expecting people to care about my tedious ideas (anyone who spends time on science blogs has had a chance to read about your work by now) and caling the blog owner names.

I don’t get enough comments that you can disturb much so I’m not going to bother banning you, at least for now. But I am henceforth ignoring you.

]]> By: John A. Davison http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-92 John A. Davison Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:18:14 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-92 It doesn't get any better than this. It doesn’t get any better than this.

]]> By: John A. Davison http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-91 John A. Davison Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:03:32 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-91 pardon the typo. exposing not esposing. pardon the typo. exposing not esposing.

]]> By: John A. Davison http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-90 John A. Davison Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:55:52 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-90 mattheath, whoever that is, apparently just another anonymous unfulfilled blowhard. It is Davison, not Davidson. I am unaware of any criticism of my work presented in a refereed journal by what you call "mainstream scientists." Perhaps you could cite a single example. On the other hand perhaps you can't. Thanks for esposing your unfounded bias. mattheath, whoever that is, apparently just another anonymous unfulfilled blowhard.

It is Davison, not Davidson. I am unaware of any criticism of my work presented in a refereed journal by what you call “mainstream scientists.” Perhaps you could cite a single example. On the other hand perhaps you can’t. Thanks for esposing your unfounded bias.

]]> By: mattheath http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-89 mattheath Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:09:21 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-89 Snapshots are now gone. Snapshots are now gone.

]]> By: mattheath http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-88 mattheath Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:46:09 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-88 Greg Laden: Yeah. A lot of people think they are good for technical definitions in maths articles but I'm coming around to the point of view that I should lose them. John A, Davidson: I have a high level of trust in the consensus of mainstream scientists as to the value of your work. Greg Laden: Yeah. A lot of people think they are good for technical definitions in maths articles but I’m coming around to the point of view that I should lose them.

John A, Davidson: I have a high level of trust in the consensus of mainstream scientists as to the value of your work.

]]> By: John A. Davison http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-87 John A. Davison Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:26:13 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-87 I am curious. What do you think of my "Prescribed Evolutionary Hypthesis" and the similar "Universal Genome Hypothesis" neither of which can ever be reconciled with the athgeist inspired Darwinian fairy tale? jadavison.wordpress.com I am curious. What do you think of my “Prescribed Evolutionary Hypthesis” and the similar “Universal Genome Hypothesis” neither of which can ever be reconciled with the athgeist inspired Darwinian fairy tale?

jadavison.wordpress.com

]]> By: John A. Davison http://mattheath.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pseudomathematics-sympathiser-at-scienceblogs/#comment-86 John A. Davison Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:26:03 +0000 http://mattheath.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-86 I am curious. What do you think of my "Prescribed Evolutionary Hypthesis" and the similar "Universal Genome Hypothesis" neither of which can ever be reconciled with the athgeist inspired Darwinian fairy tale? jadavison.wordpress.com I am curious. What do you think of my “Prescribed Evolutionary Hypthesis” and the similar “Universal Genome Hypothesis” neither of which can ever be reconciled with the athgeist inspired Darwinian fairy tale?

jadavison.wordpress.com

]]>